Hi all!
After upgrading to OpenSSL 0.9.8 I received a lot of warnings about 'long long' datatype not supported by C89 (I compile with -ansi). Now I have to compile with -std=c99 instead. I guess this is done intentionally (I mean breaking C89? ) Best Regards Steffen Fiksdal ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org User Support Mailing List [hidden email] Automated List Manager [hidden email] |
Steffen Fiksdal writes:
> After upgrading to OpenSSL 0.9.8 I received a lot of warnings about > 'long long' datatype not supported by C89 (I compile with -ansi). Which files did you get that warning on (I'd be happy to take a look at a build log), and what compiler (including the version)? A small detail: ANSI C is C99 these days (as far as I understand).. > I guess this is done intentionally (I mean breaking C89? ) Not really, but it depends a bit on who tested and on what. With compilers that don't complain about 'long long' or that believe ANSI C == C99, you don't get that kind of warning. In other words, it's easy to miss. I'll happily correct this for 0.9.8a if I can. Cheers, Richard ----- Please consider sponsoring my work on free software. See http://www.free.lp.se/sponsoring.html for details. -- Richard Levitte [hidden email] http://richard.levitte.org/ "When I became a man I put away childish things, including the fear of childishness and the desire to be very grown up." -- C.S. Lewis ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org User Support Mailing List [hidden email] Automated List Manager [hidden email] |
> Steffen Fiksdal writes: > > > After upgrading to OpenSSL 0.9.8 I received a lot of warnings about > > 'long long' datatype not supported by C89 (I compile with -ansi). > > Which files did you get that warning on (I'd be happy to take a look at a > build log), and what compiler (including the version)? A small detail: ANSI > C is C99 these days (as far as I understand).. I use gcc 3.2.3 on a Linux 2.4 box. In gcc 3.2.3 the "-ansi" flag means compliance with C89. If this has changed in later gcc's I don't know. I receive: warning: ISO C89 does not support 'long long'. This applies to several header files, among those sha.h: #define SHA_LONG64 unsigned long long > > I guess this is done intentionally (I mean breaking C89? ) > > Not really, but it depends a bit on who tested and on what. With compilers > that don't complain about 'long long' or that believe ANSI C == C99, you > don't get that kind of warning. In other words, it's easy to miss. I'll > happily correct this for 0.9.8a if I can.a I don't know is this is wrong, but my compiler says that "-ansi" is C89 ... Best Regards Steffen Fiksdal ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org User Support Mailing List [hidden email] Automated List Manager [hidden email] |
Steffen Fiksdal writes:
> I use gcc 3.2.3 on a Linux 2.4 box. In gcc 3.2.3 the "-ansi" flag means > compliance with C89. If this has changed in later gcc's I don't know. There's a quick solution, BTW: -Wno-long-long Since your platform obviously can handle long long, I think it's safe to suppress that warning. Cheers, Richard ----- Please consider sponsoring my work on free software. See http://www.free.lp.se/sponsoring.html for details. -- Richard Levitte [hidden email] http://richard.levitte.org/ "When I became a man I put away childish things, including the fear of childishness and the desire to be very grown up." -- C.S. Lewis ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org User Support Mailing List [hidden email] Automated List Manager [hidden email] |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |