Hi everybody,
we have a new platform - Macs with Intel processors. Is there a chance to build a static library (i386 code) for linking in Xcode 2.2? A static library with ppc code has been done already. I'd like to end up with a Universal Binary of my code. Thanks a lot for any ideas! ------------------------------------------------- TOPIX Informationssysteme AG, http://www.topix.de Rudolf-Diesel-Strasse 14, D-85521 Ottobrunn Tel: +49-89-608757-0, Fax: +49-89-608757-11 E-Mail: [hidden email] ------------------------------------------------- ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org User Support Mailing List [hidden email] Automated List Manager [hidden email] |
Jörg Eyring wrote:
> Hi everybody, > > we have a new platform - Macs with Intel processors. > > Is there a chance to build a static library (i386 code) for linking in Xcode > 2.2? A static library with ppc code has been done already. I'd like to end > up with a Universal Binary of my code. For fun; doesn't configuring to build bsd x86 work for you? Provided your toolchain looks even remotely like a bsd box, where darwin is derived from, the assembly code will be x86. ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org User Support Mailing List [hidden email] Automated List Manager [hidden email] |
Hi William,
thanks for your hint. I'd give it a try, but I must admit that I'm neither a "Configure"- nor a "Perl"-Guru :'( A short description where to change the appropriate setting(s) would be helpful. Maybe someone has already done it? Jörg >> Hi everybody, >> >> we have a new platform - Macs with Intel processors. >> >> Is there a chance to build a static library (i386 code) for linking in Xcode >> 2.2? A static library with ppc code has been done already. I'd like to end >> up with a Universal Binary of my code. > > For fun; doesn't configuring to build bsd x86 work for you? Provided your > toolchain looks even remotely like a bsd box, where darwin is derived from, > the assembly code will be x86. ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org User Support Mailing List [hidden email] Automated List Manager [hidden email] |
In reply to this post by Jörg Eyring
if you google "ssl and ssh", you will find a few pages regarding this issue, such as: http://www.snailbook.com/faq/ssl.auto.html http://www.rpatrick.com/tech/ssh-ssl/ but all in all, what ssl accomplishes can be done by ssh and what ssh accomplishes can be done by ssl. it seems to me that this is just another example of complicities (confuses) created by human. mybe a little bit off the topic. but any thoughts from this list? ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org User Support Mailing List [hidden email] Automated List Manager [hidden email] |
Chong Peng wrote:
>if you google "ssl and ssh", you will find a few pages regarding this issue, such as: > >http://www.snailbook.com/faq/ssl.auto.html >http://www.rpatrick.com/tech/ssh-ssl/ > >but all in all, what ssl accomplishes can be done by ssh and what ssh accomplishes can be done by ssl. it seems to me that this is just another example of complicities (confuses) created by human. > >mybe a little bit off the topic. but any thoughts from this list? > > communications. You could write applications that do the same thing as the ssh/sshd-applications using SSL as protocol. I have not seen applications other than ssh/scp/sftp using the SSH protocol, though I think they may be possible to realise. IMHO the main difference if you want to develop new applications is the existence of such a great and widely used API for SSL, for which I don't know a counterpart for the SSH-protocol... ;) If you want to go into details of security and usefulness, I guess it's easy to start flame wars. Hope it helps. Ted ;) -- PGP Public Key Information Download complete Key from http://www.convey.de/ted/tedkey_convey.asc Key fingerprint = 31B0 E029 BCF9 6605 DAC1 B2E1 0CC8 70F4 7AFB 8D26 |
In reply to this post by Chong Peng
In message <[hidden email]> on Thu, 19 Jan 2006 11:03:09 -0800, "Chong Peng" <[hidden email]> said:
ChongPeng> if you google "ssl and ssh", you will find a few pages ChongPeng> regarding this issue, such as: ChongPeng> ChongPeng> http://www.snailbook.com/faq/ssl.auto.html ChongPeng> http://www.rpatrick.com/tech/ssh-ssl/ ChongPeng> ChongPeng> but all in all, what ssl accomplishes can be done by ssh ChongPeng> and what ssh accomplishes can be done by ssl. it seems to ChongPeng> me that this is just another example of complicities ChongPeng> (confuses) created by human. There are quite a few perspectives from which to answer: Trust: the trust model differs. SSL uses the X.509 model, which is an authority hierarchy (roughly, there's actually a lot more to say about it). SSH uses a much more personal style, where the individual user is responsable for his keys and how they are to be used and authenticated. Cryptographic security: there's not really a lot of difference between the two in this respect. They use methods for key exchange and data encryption that are fairly similar to each other. Interface: SSH and SSL are widely different in this respect. SSH works as an application that you can call and tunnel whatever you wish through, while SSL comes as a library of routines to use instead of your usual network calls. However, there are SSL applications that provide the same kind of functionality as SSH; stunnel provides tunneling, stelnet provides secure remote login. There are probably other perspectives that I forget... Cheers, Richard -- Richard Levitte [hidden email] http://richard.levitte.org/ "When I became a man I put away childish things, including the fear of childishness and the desire to be very grown up." -- C.S. Lewis ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org User Support Mailing List [hidden email] Automated List Manager [hidden email] |
In reply to this post by Jörg Eyring
Hi Jorg, you've mentioned in your message that 'A static library with ppc code has been done already.'
Could you pl. share here how you've done it ? I'm trying to do the same on my mac but can't even run the 'config' script that comes with the source. Thanks a ton. |
Hi,
> Hi Jorg, you've mentioned in your message that 'A static library with ppc code > has been done already.' > > Could you pl. share here how you've done it ? I'm trying to do the same on my > mac but can't even run the 'config' script that comes with the source. > > Thanks a ton. It should be quite easy. Have you read the "INSTALL" document? Unzip the openssl.tar, read the "INSTALL" document, go into Terminal (you should have Xcode installed), set the directory to the unzipped openssl dir, type "./config", and then, when this has finished, type "make". After that (it ran about 10 mins on my Mac) you'll find two ".a" libraries in the openssl folder which can be used to link your program with. Jörg ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org User Support Mailing List [hidden email] Automated List Manager [hidden email] |
Hi Jorg, thanks a lot for your prompt reply!
My initial source was giving me problems, but when I picked the latest one, it compiled like magic! Thanks once again! |
Hi Jorg, sorry to bother you again, but another quick question.
The libraries I built do not contain support for MD4 functions (e.g. MD4Init etc.) and hence I can't link these functions into my code. Is there some build option that I need to specify to build them ? Thanks! |
In reply to this post by Shriniwas-Kulkarni
Oops! Those MD function names include an underscore inbetween and are like MD4_Init() instead of MD4Init().
My code is now building fine. Sorry to have bothered you! Thanks! |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |